The Decision of the Synod of Dordt on the
Five Main Points of Doctrine in Dispute in the Netherlands is
popularly known as the Canons of Dordt. It consists of
statements of doctrine adopted by the great Synod of Dordt which
met in the city of Dordrecht in 1618-19. Although this was a
national synod of the Reformed churches of the Netherlands, it
had an international character, since it was composed not only
of Dutch delegates but also of twenty-six delegates from eight
foreign countries.
The Synod of Dordt was held in order to
settle a serious controversy in the Dutch churches initiated by
the rise of Arminianism. Jacob Arminius, a theological professor
at Leiden University, questioned the teaching of Calvin and his
followers on a number of important points. After Arminius's
death, his own followers presented their views on five of these
points in the Remonstrance of 1610. In this document or in later
more explicit writings, the Arminians taught election based on
foreseen faith, universal atonement, partial depravity,
resistible grace, and the possibility of a lapse from grace. In
the Canons the Synod of Dordt rejected these views and set forth
the Reformed doctrine on these points, namely, unconditional
election, limited atonement, total depravity, irresistible
grace, and the perseverance of saints.
The Canons have a special character because
of their original purpose as a judicial decision on the
doctrinal points in dispute during the Arminian controversy. The
original preface called them a "judgment, in which both the
true view, agreeing with God's Word, concerning the aforesaid
five points of doctrine is explained, and the false view,
disagreeing with God's Word, is rejected." The Canons also
have a limited character in that they do not cover the whole
range of doctrine, but focus on the five points of doctrine in
dispute.
Each of the main points consists of a
positive and a negative part, the former being an exposition of
the Reformed doctrine on the subject, the latter a repudiation
of the corresponding errors. Each of the errors being rejected
is shown in bold maroon type. Although in form there are
only four points, we speak properly of five points, because the
Canons were structured to correspond to the five articles of the
1610 Remonstrance. Main Points 3 and 4 were combined into one,
always designated as Main Point III/IV.
This translation of the Canons, based on
the only extant Latin manuscript among those signed at the Synod
of Dordt, was adopted by the 1986 Synod of the Christian
Reformed Church. The biblical quotations are translations from
the original Latin and so do not always correspond to current
versions. Though not in the original text, subheadings have been
added to the positive articles and to the conclusion in order to
facilitate study of the Canons.